"The something else I’m detailing here may in fact be a man’s genuine passion, but his impetus to engage (or over-engage) in it comes as a result of a need for escapism rather than genuine fervor for it." - High value men are motivated by the need to build something, not "as a result of a need for escapism."
I remember reading somewhere a long time ago that a woman should only be a complement to a man's life, never the focus of it. That simple philosophy stuck with me. It's how I lived my life. I followed my own passions (i.e. coding, finance, cars, fine dining, reading, home theater) and to the extent that a woman can make any of these things more enjoyable, I'm happy to include her in my life. But the idea of marrying a woman and living my life in service to her and her ever changing emotions? Sorry, that's just insane.
As a Christian, I've never understood why so many fellow believers embrace such a miserable, retarded lifestyle. The Bible is clear that although marriage is not a sin, a man is better off single. I honestly feel that these dudes see their own misery and suffering as some sort of virtue.
There is no reason for men to participate in a society that is not for them. These people want men to participate more without making the society more for them, which just sounds like enslavement dressed up in "because it's the right thing to do" verbiage.
That being said, I would suggest your argument around gynocentrism could use refinement. It is not necessarily gynocentric simply for a man to do something which makes himself valuable to women. That is ascribing a thought pattern to a mere observation of behavior. Men pursue things that are ostensibly gynocentric simply by following their biological programming, and I would argue a proper understanding of the red pill is not just attempting to break this programming.
The real red pill is a mature understanding of power dynamics in all aspects of life AND developing the capacity to act on it.
The blue pill, by contrast, is purposefully ignorant of power dynamics because it plays by the rules of "be nice and receive niceness".
I wouldn't shame someone for running from any sort of power dynamic that they don't want to engage in, but I don't see it as "blue pilled" or shortsighted or whatever simply for engaging in a power dynamic that appears to not be in their favor. I think this is something one must inevitably do — existence calls for it. So, existentialism applied to gender dynamics means that men (and women) can be happy engaging clear-eyed in a system that doesn't seem to favor them.
How in the world did this imperative to “rescue” our daughters create this necessity to save our sons. I so want to help. I am convinced that now is the time, if any, to stand up. I can’t imagine such a fate. It makes you wonder what on earth were we ever saving our daughters from?
I will not tolerate it, and would not. It is a curse that only God can stop. If it means forcing boys to be men then so be it. Why have them escape something that we can end? Atleast it puts things back in their rightful positions.
Attention women. You really should have treated the very best of men like me better. I am working on introducing Sharia Law to the west. Young men and boys will very much like Sharia Law.
Well? In case you have not noticed over the last 18 years a very large number of muslim men of military age have entered western countries like the UK. We now have 150+ Sharia Law courts running in the UK. Even Theresa May said that Sharia Law courts had standing in the UK.
In the US Muslim men have even established “Muslim Community Patrols” that dress very similar to police officers and set up their cars very much like police officers.
We will have Sharia Law in the UK soon enough. Even King Charles and Prince William are consistently making positive statements about Islam.
Agree.
I could probably have supported 4-5 kids at this point, but saw no point in becoming the divorced dad struggling to pay alimony and child support.
"The something else I’m detailing here may in fact be a man’s genuine passion, but his impetus to engage (or over-engage) in it comes as a result of a need for escapism rather than genuine fervor for it." - High value men are motivated by the need to build something, not "as a result of a need for escapism."
I remember reading somewhere a long time ago that a woman should only be a complement to a man's life, never the focus of it. That simple philosophy stuck with me. It's how I lived my life. I followed my own passions (i.e. coding, finance, cars, fine dining, reading, home theater) and to the extent that a woman can make any of these things more enjoyable, I'm happy to include her in my life. But the idea of marrying a woman and living my life in service to her and her ever changing emotions? Sorry, that's just insane.
As a Christian, I've never understood why so many fellow believers embrace such a miserable, retarded lifestyle. The Bible is clear that although marriage is not a sin, a man is better off single. I honestly feel that these dudes see their own misery and suffering as some sort of virtue.
There is no reason for men to participate in a society that is not for them. These people want men to participate more without making the society more for them, which just sounds like enslavement dressed up in "because it's the right thing to do" verbiage.
That being said, I would suggest your argument around gynocentrism could use refinement. It is not necessarily gynocentric simply for a man to do something which makes himself valuable to women. That is ascribing a thought pattern to a mere observation of behavior. Men pursue things that are ostensibly gynocentric simply by following their biological programming, and I would argue a proper understanding of the red pill is not just attempting to break this programming.
The real red pill is a mature understanding of power dynamics in all aspects of life AND developing the capacity to act on it.
The blue pill, by contrast, is purposefully ignorant of power dynamics because it plays by the rules of "be nice and receive niceness".
I wouldn't shame someone for running from any sort of power dynamic that they don't want to engage in, but I don't see it as "blue pilled" or shortsighted or whatever simply for engaging in a power dynamic that appears to not be in their favor. I think this is something one must inevitably do — existence calls for it. So, existentialism applied to gender dynamics means that men (and women) can be happy engaging clear-eyed in a system that doesn't seem to favor them.
How in the world did this imperative to “rescue” our daughters create this necessity to save our sons. I so want to help. I am convinced that now is the time, if any, to stand up. I can’t imagine such a fate. It makes you wonder what on earth were we ever saving our daughters from?
I will not tolerate it, and would not. It is a curse that only God can stop. If it means forcing boys to be men then so be it. Why have them escape something that we can end? Atleast it puts things back in their rightful positions.
Attention women. You really should have treated the very best of men like me better. I am working on introducing Sharia Law to the west. Young men and boys will very much like Sharia Law.
How exactly would you do it? 😀
Do you mean how are we bringing Sharia Law to the west?
Correct. Do you work for the UK Immigration Office? 😆
Well? In case you have not noticed over the last 18 years a very large number of muslim men of military age have entered western countries like the UK. We now have 150+ Sharia Law courts running in the UK. Even Theresa May said that Sharia Law courts had standing in the UK.
In the US Muslim men have even established “Muslim Community Patrols” that dress very similar to police officers and set up their cars very much like police officers.
We will have Sharia Law in the UK soon enough. Even King Charles and Prince William are consistently making positive statements about Islam.
You sound insane. Good luck with that.
Well Timothy, maybe you should not have supported womens crimes against men.
Hi Rollo, I am teaching young men and boys to never get married and never have kids. We are winning.